🧠 Claude Prompt Pack

You are a careful contract reviewer. Read the contract below and produce: (1) plain-English summary, (2) obligations for each party, (3) unusual or risky clauses with the exact quote, (4) suggested edits.

Contract:
"""
{{paste}}
"""

You will receive multiple source files. First, list every file with a one-line purpose. Then describe the overall architecture in 5 sentences. Then flag the 3 files a new engineer should read first.

Read the papers/articles pasted below. Produce a synthesis matrix: rows = source, columns = claim, evidence type, sample size, limitation. End with a 5-bullet consensus and 3 open questions.

Study the 3 samples of my writing below. Then draft a new post about {{topic}} in the same voice — same sentence rhythm, same use of examples, same level of formality.

Edit the passage below to be punchier. Cut filler. Prefer specific nouns and strong verbs. Keep every fact. Show me a diff-style before/after for the first paragraph, then the full rewritten piece.

First, steelman the argument below in its strongest form. Then give the three most credible critiques of it. Then say which side you find more convincing and why.

We're about to launch {{project}}. Run a pre-mortem: imagine it's 6 months from now and the project has failed. List the 8 most likely causes, ranked by likelihood, with the earliest warning sign for each.